
webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. They say they preferred him dead, but if one goes in like that it is to take a person alive. Which would be logical because you want to, uhm, debrief the guy, like Sadam. Otherwise you bomb the place. They say they didn't do that to protect the innocent, except in all those wikileaked cases, like the famous bombed wedding. This has been consistent, because after a tip they rather kill innocent civilians by bombing the place than go in on the ground and risk their own lives. So it's a sick claim. Looking at the crashed helicopter my guess is the operation was at least a partly fuckup. Body tossed into sea, no pictures? Story stinks. So now we have a story from the USA government (pathological liars) with major inconsistencies. I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Crazy9000 wrote:webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. [...] I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Well if you just bombed the place, it could be a situation of "we bombed a building that we THINK Osama was in, and he PROBABLY died. The plan would be to go in and have a confirmed kill, and retain the body.
This is where the next part of the story stops making any sense at all. Why would you just dump all the evidence ASAP and not even release any photo evidence? I honestly don't know what the hell is going on there.
The only evidence they've really put out is a DNA test against his sister, which matches it 99.9%. That initially sounds like a done deal, but talk to anyone who does DNA and they'll tell you otherwise. 99.9% means one out of a thousand people would match the profile.
webwit wrote:...
Show us the boooody!!! ...

ripster wrote:...
Last time that happened it took nearly a decade to finally kill Milosevic with Dutch food.
Crazy9000 wrote:webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. They say they preferred him dead, but if one goes in like that it is to take a person alive. Which would be logical because you want to, uhm, debrief the guy, like Sadam. Otherwise you bomb the place. They say they didn't do that to protect the innocent, except in all those wikileaked cases, like the famous bombed wedding. This has been consistent, because after a tip they rather kill innocent civilians by bombing the place than go in on the ground and risk their own lives. So it's a sick claim. Looking at the crashed helicopter my guess is the operation was at least a partly fuckup. Body tossed into sea, no pictures? Story stinks. So now we have a story from the USA government (pathological liars) with major inconsistencies. I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Well if you just bombed the place, it could be a situation of "we bombed a building that we THINK Osama was in, and he PROBABLY died. The plan would be to go in and have a confirmed kill, and retain the body.
This is where the next part of the story stops making any sense at all. Why would you just dump all the evidence ASAP and not even release any photo evidence? I honestly don't know what the hell is going on there.
The only evidence they've really put out is a DNA test against his sister, which matches it 99.9%. That initially sounds like a done deal, but talk to anyone who does DNA and they'll tell you otherwise. 99.9% means one out of a thousand people would match the profile.
ripster wrote:
You know, NOW I know why OCN mods are so stubborn.
I thought they were crazy bastards divorced from reality.
Especially that "use PS/2 instead of USB" stuff.
That crazy talk man.
P.S. I'm glad OCN Gameserver Mods don't have forum banhammers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests