SSK - 8 months on and still in love

User avatar
ShivaYash

25 Aug 2015, 22:57

Hands down this is the best keyboard ever made. I've moving to Australia for five months and seriously thinking of packing this in my suitcase to hook up with my MBA. I have a HHKB Pro 2 but... I can't be without the SSK.

Thoughts?
L1004408 j.jpg
L1004408 j.jpg (918.84 KiB) Viewed 4903 times

harlw

26 Aug 2015, 21:05

Gorgeous board!

User avatar
ShivaYash

26 Aug 2015, 21:56

harlw wrote:Gorgeous board!
Thank you. It's a wonderful thing from 1987 and rather special and customised for my needs. Sure it has some battle scars and is not bolt modded but it does not need it I think. It's lost a few rivets but all the keys are super smooth. It's taken a while to get to this stage and lots of cleaning but it's my daily driver now. My HHKB is my travel board and I suspect I've got to make it my daily driver during my time in Australia. First world problems heh?

User avatar
idollar
i$

26 Aug 2015, 23:04

I like your mont blanc meisterstuck.
I do not understand how people can type in a desk without a proper place to let their pens rest ;)

I am with you, my pens deserve at lease an SSK :D

Good choice.

User avatar
POTV

30 Aug 2015, 19:01

I very much agree with you, ShivaYash. I bought several IBM Model M's, before I discovered the SSK. Now I have 3 SSK's from 1987.

The SSK is perhaps not the most stylish, but as a writing tool it´s close to perfect: Solid, compact and with a great clicky feeling. I think I one day should be trying the Matias Mini Quiet Pro. But I don't like the arrow keys layout. So I´ll probably stick to my SSK´s.

User avatar
Madhias
BS TORPE

30 Aug 2015, 20:03

Great desk! I really like that used wood. I am also loving my SSK, it has a normal layout, a nice click, and can be repaired!

User avatar
ShivaYash

30 Aug 2015, 20:52

with 30 kgs each + two babies, and travelling for five months, my wife will issue me with a divorce if she see's this in my suitcase! alas... I will have to find a SSK in Australia.

User avatar
Muirium
µ

30 Aug 2015, 21:05

Take the HHKB. It's the better travel board. If you were talking about a Kishsaver, I could understand. Those are eternal classics, and damn hard to find. Of course, the little board is 3 kg naked so you'd still be in trouble for travelling!

User avatar
sz42

03 Sep 2015, 23:37

5 months would be a long time to be away from essentials like a good, comfortable keyboard... Especially, a keyboard that is a joy to use and look at, as yours clearly is. However, it sounds like you also have an easy choice and don't need to concern yourself with shelling out for a new HHKB or wife.

I have used the Macbook Air's built-in keyboard almost daily for over 3 years now since I didn't know any better (and because the stock Mac keyboard never worked properly). It was only very recently that I acquired my first mechanical keyboard at home; It's just a tad too noisy for work (Cherry MX Blues) and, because I am still very new to this keyboard hobby, am still *dangerously* short of nice keyboards.

You've got me seriously thinking about my travel keyboard options now though so, good job, thanks.

User avatar
darkspider

04 Sep 2015, 06:46

It totally must be a great board, and I've wanted one for a long time. But it's too expensive on e-bay.
Hmm, I'm envious. Love it forever.

User avatar
ShivaYash

04 Sep 2015, 10:29

sz42 wrote:5 months would be a long time to be away from essentials like a good, comfortable keyboard... Especially, a keyboard that is a joy to use and look at, as yours clearly is. However, it sounds like you also have an easy choice and don't need to concern yourself with shelling out for a new HHKB or wife.

I have used the Macbook Air's built-in keyboard almost daily for over 3 years now since I didn't know any better (and because the stock Mac keyboard never worked properly). It was only very recently that I acquired my first mechanical keyboard at home; It's just a tad too noisy for work (Cherry MX Blues) and, because I am still very new to this keyboard hobby, am still *dangerously* short of nice keyboards.

You've got me seriously thinking about my travel keyboard options now though so, good job, thanks.
HHKB Pro2.

User avatar
Hypersphere

04 Sep 2015, 19:12

The SSK is a beautiful and highly functional board. However, since using the HHKB Pro 2, I remap all my keyboards to a HHKB layout, so that the extra keys on a TKL board like the SSK end up being wasted. Five months will fly by quickly, and travel is less of a hassle if you travel light. Therefore, for choosing a travel board, go with the HHKB Pro 2.

User avatar
ShivaYash

04 Sep 2015, 19:21

Hypersphere wrote:The SSK is a beautiful and highly functional board. However, since using the HHKB Pro 2, I remap all my keyboards to a HHKB layout, so that the extra keys on a TKL board like the SSK end up being wasted. Five months will fly by quickly, and travel is less of a hassle if you travel light. Therefore, for choosing a travel board, go with the HHKB Pro 2.
You are right. Although I won't be travelling with the board, just setting up a new office for 4 months. But the HHKB will make me look less like a geek and be quieter should I be sharing the space.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

04 Sep 2015, 19:24

Quieter yes, less geek no. :D

User avatar
Hypersphere

04 Sep 2015, 19:48

seebart wrote: Quieter yes, less geek no. :D
+1 !

User avatar
Muirium
µ

04 Sep 2015, 19:51

60%s are more imposing in their geek factor than TKLs.

"How the hell do you even use that thing?"

User avatar
Khers

04 Sep 2015, 20:34

Additionally, while the HHKB (especially in black) looks considerably more mainstream than an SSK, it still can't quite pull off looking like an apple wireless keyboard, can it. One of the first things to come out of people visiting my office for the first time are comments regarding my HHKB. Almost never fails. At the same time, no one ever asks my colleague, with whom I share office, any questions about his apple keyboard.

User avatar
ShivaYash

05 Sep 2015, 18:53

I picked up an ISO full size model M earlier this week and have been using it since. Its a 1990 model with intact rivets. Dare I say this... but I prefer it to the SSK. I think it is because the SSK has had a harder life, broken rivets. The newer board feels so light and has a different audible note, you'd think they were not related! Also, I have forgotten how good ISO layout is. #delighted

User avatar
ShivaYash

05 Sep 2015, 19:00

Are all model M's the same when it comes to key switch weight?

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

05 Sep 2015, 19:07

Yes they are. But the early square label M's feel slightly different due to better build quality.

User avatar
ShivaYash

05 Sep 2015, 19:35

seebart wrote:Yes they are. But the early square label M's feel slightly different due to better build quality.
Ah. How do you tell? The ssk is a '87 model made in the USA with black/ grey label. The full size is a '90 made in the UK.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

05 Sep 2015, 19:51

Weigh them. The early ones are heavier.

User avatar
HAL

05 Sep 2015, 23:19

seebart wrote: Weigh them. The early ones are heavier.
1987 SSK ~1800g
IBM Model M SSK 1391472 from 1987
IBM Model M SSK 1391472 from 1987
IBM_Model_M_SSK_1391472_19870713_weight_1120x720.jpg (136.69 KiB) Viewed 4367 times
1993 SSK ~1600g
IBM Model M SSK 1370475 from 1993
IBM Model M SSK 1370475 from 1993
IBM_Model_M_SSK_1370475_19930406_weight_1120x720.jpg (117.49 KiB) Viewed 4367 times

User avatar
HAL

05 Sep 2015, 23:44

1993 industrial SSK ~1650g
IBM Model M industrial  SSK 1395682 from 1993
IBM Model M industrial SSK 1395682 from 1993
IBM_Model_M_industrial_SSK_1395682_1993-01-07_weight_1120x720.jpg (135.04 KiB) Viewed 4356 times

User avatar
HAL

06 Sep 2015, 00:15

1989 SSK ~1770g
IBM Model M SSK 1395217 from 1989
IBM Model M SSK 1395217 from 1989
IBM_Model_M_SSK_1395217_19891016_weight_1120x720.jpg (129.5 KiB) Viewed 4341 times

User avatar
Redmaus
Gotta start somewhere

06 Sep 2015, 00:25

What makes them heavier?

User avatar
ShivaYash

06 Sep 2015, 00:25

Heavy is better?

User avatar
Muirium
µ

06 Sep 2015, 00:57

IBM was in the business of cost cutting these boards over the years, so yes. The Model M is a cheaper implementation of buckling spring than the Model F that came before it. They put less dye on the caps (stronger, deeper, bolder legends on older Ms and the Fs, which took more hours in the dye sub oven), and they were up to corner cutting tricks everywhere they could find them.

It's the small things, that add up.

User avatar
chzel

06 Sep 2015, 01:11

Redmaus wrote: What makes them heavier?
Thinner steel plates for one, and maybe thinner case plastics?

User avatar
clickykeyboards

06 Sep 2015, 02:57

Image


Comparison of Model M keyboard weights (1986 - 2003)
http://www.clickeykeyboards.com/model-m ... 1986-2003/

Post Reply

Return to “Keyboards”