IBM PC turns 35

User avatar
alh84001
v.001

12 Aug 2016, 20:16

On this date, 35 years ago, IBM Personal Computer 5150 was released. With it came one of the iconic keyboards we all love and cherish, the first model F keyboard - known around these parts as the F XT keyboard. I don't know if engineers back then envisaged that not only these machines would be alive and well 35 years later, but would be an embodiment of the phrase "they don't make them like they used to". Cynics among you might bemoan the fact that beamsprings didn't last a couple of years longer to be as massed produced as these boards, but to make a superficial comparison, that would be like belittling a VW Beetle for not being a Rolls-Royce. I got my first XT keboard this year, and I wouldn't be surprised if it sticks with me for next 35 years.

On a personal note, with PC being released in August 1981, I wouldn't be surprised if there were some (prototype) XT boards manufactured in late 1980. It would mean that somewhere out there might be an XT close to my birthday. Part of me wishes that it is true, and part of it doesn't want to hear it :) In any case, it would be fun to find out who here among us has the earliest XT produced.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

12 Aug 2016, 21:04

Mine is from 07/84. I guarantee you we have older ones here.
IMG_20160812_210118.jpg
IMG_20160812_210118.jpg (939.48 KiB) Viewed 4639 times

User avatar
zslane

12 Aug 2016, 21:33

alh84001 wrote: On this date, 35 years ago, IBM Personal Computer 5150 was released. With it came one of the iconic keyboards we all love and cherish, the first model F keyboard - known around these parts as the F XT keyboard.
Well, not all of us.

I feel that everything IBM ever put on a desktop after 1980 has been a blight on computer aesthetics. Relentlessly bland is perhaps the kindest thing to say about their hardware; ugly is more apt, and soul-withering would be accurate if a bit harsh. Apple's 1984 Macintosh ad was dead on in spirit, and its not-so-hidden metaphors painfully truthful. I quite honestly do not understand why anyone has any fondness for Model F or M keyboards. They are keyboards only the machines they were hooked up to could possibly love...

Sorry if it sounds like I'm raining on the IBM parade, but I thought I'd offer a refreshingly dissenting view, one which is not heard much in these parts.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

12 Aug 2016, 21:43

Absolutely normal that everyone has different taste and preferences, anything else would be strange.

User avatar
alh84001
v.001

12 Aug 2016, 21:55

I agree, and in fact it's always nice to have someone offer a differing opinion.

However, I disagree on characterising the IBM aesthetic as bland. If anything, I find that Apple's hardware from the same time period has aged considerably worse, Macs especially. I find that sweetly ironic considering that 1984 campaign :)

User avatar
zslane

12 Aug 2016, 22:05

I don't know if I would call it ironic. More like depressing in how it failed to fully mobilize an enduring counter-culture that could displace the IBM juggernaut (which ultimately became the Microsoft juggernaut).

Even today, the original Macintosh hardware has charm that appeals on an emotional level. The IBM PC/XT/AT and all the clones that followed were, and remain, bland, utilitarian workhorses that are iconic but for all the wrong reasons.

I liken IBM's contribution to desktop computing to a colonoscopy: very important and necessary, and about as pleasant.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

12 Aug 2016, 22:12

OK zslane you're clearly not an IBM fan we get it. Colonoscopy is a pretty rough comparison though. It may not look sleek, but they did come out with good hardware. From a pure build quality point the XT is and remains on of the sturdiest keyboards out there.Capacitive buckling spring is a great switch.

User avatar
Halvar

12 Aug 2016, 22:40

Let's not forget though that IBM was only reacting to what CBM, Apple and others did in the PC space in the late 70s. Visicalc, the first spreadsheet, was an Apple II program that came out in 1979. If there's one program that proved the value of PCs for business it was the spreadsheet.

If you look at the industrial design of the first IBM PCs you see that they came from a company that understood business-grade quality. (The electronic design was pretty crappy though...)

Compared to CBM and Apple designs of the same time like the CBMs and the Apple II, the IBM PC is the least "cheaply" built one by far. This fully reflects in the quality of their keyboards. The Macintosh, that came 3 years later, was a bit of a different story, because Steve Jobs had his own understanding of what "personal computer" should mean, but one tends to forget over all the Ridley Scott and Steve Jobs admiration that the first Macintoshes were overpriced toys that you couldn't do a lot with at the workplace, which is also why they didn't sell at all.

The cheaping out on the IBM PC side in the mid-80s didn't come from IBM but from the price pressure the clone builders put on IBM.

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

12 Aug 2016, 22:41

Apple gear from the most recent decade may age moderately well, but pre-millenial Apple is hopelessly goofy and dated-looking.

IBM may be plain, but I happen to like beige, and after the layouts got settled down by about 1984, it has been generally handsome and understated.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

12 Aug 2016, 22:54

I really do like both in their own respects. They're so different I would never dream to compare the two.

User avatar
zslane

12 Aug 2016, 23:48

seebart wrote: I really do like both in their own respects. They're so different I would never dream to compare the two.
You're right, they can't really be compared, unless you are talking about the dreadful inter-Jobs years when Apple tried to compete in the PC clone space. They can only be contrasted for the profoundly different experience they are intended to deliver to the user. However, I kind of feel that the vastly different design philosophies between them serve as a sort of Rorschach Test for their respective adherents. I mean, if build quality and two shades of nearly colorless "warm gray" get you hot... ;)

I also sometimes wonder about the folks here who love the Model Ms and Fs so much. How many used them when they originally came out? And how many are riding some kind of faux nostalgia for a product they only know about historically? And of those who actually used them back in the early 80s, did you love them back then too? Cuz I've had the "pleasure" of using them since they were introduced and I've hated them from day one (it didn't take the introduction of the Macintosh to induce it, is my point I guess). :P

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

13 Aug 2016, 00:00

zslane wrote: I mean, if build quality and two shades of nearly colorless "warm gray" get you hot... ;)
The switch and the build quality are great yes. Get me hot? Not so much. :maverick:
zslane wrote: I also sometimes wonder about the folks here who love the Model Ms and Fs so much. How many used them when they originally came out? And how many are riding some kind of faux nostalgia for a product they only know about historically? And of those who actually used them back in the early 80s, did you love them back then too? Cuz I've had the "pleasure" of using them since they were introduced and I've hated them from day one (it didn't take the introduction of the Macintosh to induce it, is my point I guess). :P
I used both when they came out but back then I did not think about the keyboards much and there weren't 73187363 options like today. Of course there is some nostalgia involved.

User avatar
dokyun

13 Aug 2016, 01:15

zslane wrote: I also sometimes wonder about the folks here who love the Model Ms and Fs so much. How many used them when they originally came out? And how many are riding some kind of faux nostalgia for a product they only know about historically? And of those who actually used them back in the early 80s, did you love them back then too? Cuz I've had the "pleasure" of using them since they were introduced and I've hated them from day one (it didn't take the introduction of the Macintosh to induce it, is my point I guess). :P
I'm old enough to have learned to type on a Model F, a 5150 XT was the first computer our family owned... timing is a bit off though, probably around 89 or 90. There's definitely nostalgia involved.

I have friends, typically younger than me, who are curious about the amount of keyboards I own and want to try them out when considering a new keyboard purchase. To date, none of them have preferred the buckling spring ones. They are definitely not for everyone, for sure.

User avatar
Hypersphere

13 Aug 2016, 01:16

The IBM PC changed my life. It was a computer, but it was personal. Not long before the introduction of the PC, people did their computing on mainframes. You had to punch a deck of cards and carry them to the mainframe temple, where the computer priests ran the job for you. Then came endless treks back and forth between your office and the computing center as you tried to eradicate bugs. After the PC, all this changed. It was possible to interact with the computer in the comfort of your own office or even your own home.

Apple computers, especially the Mac, tended to elicit emotional responses from their users, but in my corporate culture of the time, only "serious" personal computers, i.e., the IBM PC, were allowed.

Later on, when things relaxed and I was able to choose between a PC and a Mac, I switched over to Mac and enjoyed it greatly, but for me the real revolution came with the introduction of the IBM PC.

Recently, I switched again from the Mac to the PC. This was prompted by two things: the greater "bang for the buck" that could be achieved putting together a PC system and the relative lack of development of software for OS X. Now I mostly use Windows and Linux, although my routine computing is done on "cheese grater" Mac Pro machines running Windows 10 under Bootcamp. And quite often, the keyboard that is connected to these Mac Pros is an IBM XT. Amazing that all this works, especially with a 35-year-old keyboard.

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

13 Aug 2016, 01:34

zslane wrote:
They can only be contrasted for the profoundly different experience they are intended to deliver to the user.
This is where the rubber meets the road.

Personally, my computer is something like my workbench, and it needs to be available for tinkering. My "computer" ie the tower case is the same one that I have used for a decade and a half, yet I doubt that one single component inside is left from the original build.

IBM probably intended for their customers to think of the computers as "appliances" like Apple did, but they left the door open for their own techs to work inside, and that made the components available for other people to work on as well.

Apple's "throwaway" components and willingness to quickly orphan their own products is not a philosophy that I can respect.

User avatar
Chyros

13 Aug 2016, 01:41

I've always liked IBM styling. It has something classy about it. A bit like old German saloon cars, before they started to make them look vulgar like nowadays. I think the styling has aged well, too ^^ .

User avatar
zslane

13 Aug 2016, 02:01

Hypersphere wrote: The IBM PC changed my life. It was a computer, but it was personal. Not long before the introduction of the PC, people did their computing on mainframes. You had to punch a deck of cards and carry them to the mainframe temple, where the computer priests ran the job for you. Then came endless treks back and forth between your office and the computing center as you tried to eradicate bugs. After the PC, all this changed. It was possible to interact with the computer in the comfort of your own office or even your own home.
Well, there was a period in between punch cards and PCs that is getting forgotten in the above. And probably because few people got to experience it.

I'm referring to my first computing experience (circa 1981-83) which was that of video terminals hooked up to multiplexing mainframes via analog dialup modems. I didn't enter program code on punch cards. I typed it into a text editor (emacs) using a regular 80x24 display and a keyboard. I didn't run back and forth where technicians in white lab coats prepared the "job" and asked me to come back the next day. I just ran the compiler command and got the results back immediately. And I did it from my bedroom. It was the same as the personal computer experience that was to follow, but far more powerful in terms of memory available, disk space available, and networked connectivity (with my high school friends who were simultaneously logged in).

For me, the IBM PC (and all personal computers of that era, for that matter) were a huge step down, at least until Macintosh came along and introduced the GUI and a graphics-oriented way to do everything. The only machines (that I was aware of at the time) which had a comparable user experience (to Macintosh) were Xerox Smalltalk machines and Symbolics Lisp Machines. Those were the machines that desktop computing engineers should have been aspiring to emulate, not boring, boxy business machines whose most compelling marketing advantage was the ability to run Lotus 1-2-3.

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

13 Aug 2016, 02:14

Chyros wrote:
It has something classy about it.
A bit like old German saloon cars,
American cars, too, back in the day.
Plain and beige can be awesome.
Attachments
1937-cord.jpg
1937-cord.jpg (51.26 KiB) Viewed 4477 times

User avatar
zslane

13 Aug 2016, 02:28

I'm pretty sure no respectable observer has ever put the terms "IBM PC" and "classy" together in the same sentence without the phrases "not", "not remotely", or "the very opposite of" in between. ;)

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

13 Aug 2016, 02:32

So what Apple keyboard do you consider to be truly handsome and/or comfortable to use?

User avatar
zslane

13 Aug 2016, 02:42

The AEK/AEK-II, which was comfortable to use but lacked character. The Snow White motif was a little too IBM PC-ish for my tastes even though the computers I had in that style at the time (a Macitosh SE and then a Mac IIci) were brilliant machines. I don't think Apple has ever really improved on the AEK family of keyboards. But they would still have been much better with double-shot sphericals!

User avatar
y11971alex

13 Aug 2016, 03:18

I do bemoan the fact that the beam spring didn't last a couple of years longer to make it on to the IBM PC train, since one of the final terminals (the 3101) to come with a beam spring keyboard cost just $1295, less than the 5150, which started at $1565. If IBM didn't retire beam spring in 1980, we might be looking at $35 for a beam spring in serviceable condition and with XT protocol, instead of $350 and requiring an xwhatsit's converter.

User avatar
zslane

13 Aug 2016, 03:45

I agree. It is a shame that IBM felt buckling spring was an improvement over beam spring, even if only economically. I feel much the same way about Hall Effect. Certainly we would have much more durable, maintenance-free, and cost-effective Hall Effect switches had they been allowed to exist (and evolve) over the last 40 years.

User avatar
Chyros

13 Aug 2016, 04:12

zslane wrote: The AEK/AEK-II, which was comfortable to use but lacked character. The Snow White motif was a little too IBM PC-ish for my tastes even though the computers I had in that style at the time (a Macitosh SE and then a Mac IIci) were brilliant machines. I don't think Apple has ever really improved on the AEK family of keyboards. But they would still have been much better with double-shot sphericals!
They're nice boards to use, and they were built well, but piss-ugly IMO. Maybe IBM didn't really put much flair into their boards, but that's part of their charm IMO. They have nothing to prove, they don't need to play the cool kid. They command respect simply by virtue of their charisma.

I guess the Model M is a bit like mob boss Paulie from Goodfellas, come to think of it.

User avatar
Touch_It

13 Aug 2016, 04:50

I love me AEK board, but Ibm model ms and F's are my favorite. I anticipate having mine the rest of my life. Seems crazy to think about, but not unrealistic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
zslane

13 Aug 2016, 05:26

Chyros wrote: Maybe IBM didn't really put much flair into their boards, but that's part of their charm IMO. They have nothing to prove, they don't need to play the cool kid. They command respect simply by virtue of their charisma.
I look back at the Honeywell terminal keyboards that inspired the Round 5 and Round 6 keycap group buys and I don't see any attempt (on Honeywell's part) to play the cool kid either. But I feel they have far more character, charm, elegance, and "charisma" than anything IBM ever made for their PC. The same can be said of the Symbolics Space Cadet, the Data General Dasher, and others.

When you have actual style, you don't have to play the cool kid, you simply are the cool kid.

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

13 Aug 2016, 14:05

zslane wrote: I look back at the Honeywell terminal keyboards that inspired the Round 5 and Round 6 keycap group buys and I don't see any attempt (on Honeywell's part) to play the cool kid either. But I feel they have far more character, charm, elegance, and "charisma" than anything IBM ever made for their PC. The same can be said of the Symbolics Space Cadet, the Data General Dasher, and others.
That's for sure, anything Honeywell has a 1000 times more charisma than big blue:
9661820507_6c4adbe303_h.jpg
9661820507_6c4adbe303_h.jpg (697 KiB) Viewed 4363 times
IMGP1947.JPG
IMGP1947.JPG (966.17 KiB) Viewed 4376 times

User avatar
Chyros

13 Aug 2016, 14:50

I fucking hate Honeywell as a company xD . That's due to different reasons though :p .

User avatar
seebart
Offtopicthority Instigator

13 Aug 2016, 14:52

Chyros wrote: I fucking hate Honeywell as a company xD . That's due to different reasons though :p .
:o I didn't know you were a hater? I do know you swear like a sailor. :mrgreen: But the Honeywell keyboards are nice I know you like them come on.

OK I just remembered this which I'm posting for zslane since he likes IBM so much, it's Steve Jobs in December 1983 in New York City:
steve.jpg
steve.jpg (96.04 KiB) Viewed 4346 times

User avatar
Hypersphere

13 Aug 2016, 15:15

Something I really must do is add a Space Cadet styled HYPER key to my keyboard(s)!

Post Reply

Return to “Keyboards”