ripster wrote:I also have been ripped off by Senior Geekhackers. Like my wiki content.
jcrouse wrote:ripster wrote:I also have been ripped off by Senior Geekhackers. Like my wiki content.
And there in lies some of the issues. Unless he edited his post or you were simply trying to be more specific yourself, I didn't notice where he mention GH specifically. So, you're trying to agree with something he did not even say? Is that psooible? Geez ... I thought he was taling about DT senior members, stupid me.
- Jack O' Lantern (Pending sale at $300)
- 3D Skull (Topre) - $150 (No BNP yet)
- Black Skull (MX) - $100 (BNP: $120)
- Gum Purple Skull (MX) - $90 (BNP: $120)
- Octopink Skull (MX) - $110 (BNP: $120)
- Orangesicle Skull (MX) - $90 (BNP: $110)
- Red Factory Second (MX) - $75 (BNP: $80)
- Jack O' Lantern (Pending sale)
- 3D Skull (Topre) - SOLD
- Black Skull (MX) - $100 (BNP: $120)
- Gum Purple Skull (MX) - (SOLD @ BNP)
- Octopink Skull (MX) - (SOLD @ BNP)
- Orangesicle Skull (MX) - $90 (BNP: $110)
- Red Factory Second (MX) - (SOLD @ BNP)
dirge wrote:thegunner100 wrote:Woohoo, a CC discussion that won't get locked or deleted, and the users won't be banned!
Did that happen often at geekhack?
ripster wrote:Well duh, half the GH Moderators are buying/selling tons of stuff.
But this DOES seem off topic. Maybe somebody should open a "Click Clack Price Bitching" thread.
thegunner100 wrote:mkawa, i propose we have a dedicated unmoderated "Click Clack Price Bitching" thread in the new GH.
jcrouse wrote:Maybe the idiots are the guys that hoard these Clacks, did you ever think of that (I don't agree)? You know, your buddies that you idolize make light of and speak of constantly ... the folks that have 50 or 100, or more of these and find it necessary to post pics and show them off. Oh yeah, there your buddied, don't blame them. This is a supply and demand game (shit, here comes the chart). In most of these situations the hoarding changes the ratios greatly, especially in limited supply and drive costs up. Maybe it's the hoarders fault. Noobs come on and make a simply comment like, geez, that ridiculous, I would never pay that much and then the move to the next thread. You old timers dwell on it constantly but then post pictures of your "holy grail" collection. Look in the freakin mirror. Some of you are so hypocritical it is actually entertaining.
What in the hell should anyone care what I spend my money on? I worked 55 freaking hours of overtime this week and if I want to pay too much for something, so be it. Does it affect you, possibly, but then so do many other factors, especially the desire to own which is greatly driven by the constant showing of pics of what one has. Like it or not, ask for it or not, some of you are idolized for you knowledge and "possessions" that you have obtained over the years. That is what collection and being an enthusiast is all about.
lock203 wrote:Well if any of you collectors/hoarders want to set an example you can sell this noob your CC's for cheap.
thegunner100 wrote:btw jcrouse, i just received your octopink MX CC! Looks great, it's a little off from the pink topre set's color, but I wouldnt be bothered by it if i can't get a original pink topre CC.
DanGWanG wrote:I didn't mean to get so riled up, so my apologies John if it came off that way.
jcrouse wrote:{Bunch of good thoughts here...}
ripster wrote:I just don't trade or sell ClickClacks. I gave one to ItlnStln but that's because he IS the Italian Stallion (lurking lately). The pics are just to irritate Demik.
demik wrote:i do agree with crouse on this need to post pictures of your collection when nobody asked you.
reaper wrote:Meh, I gave them away for free more than I care to remember. Some over at GH and some over here for DT members (some went all the way to Korea). They're just pieces of plastic. lol
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests