Page 14 of 18

Posted: 17 Apr 2012, 16:58
by The Demongolator
Yes! :twisted: That's the spirit! :twisted:

Posted: 17 Apr 2012, 20:52
by off
That head.. Image
Is it geekgirl after all that's happened? :o

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 00:44
by iamwhoiam
This forum appears to be back-stabbing central. This is why I take nothing to heart on forums, because it's not worthwhile. I treat each one of you on your individual merits, as human beings, but as a collective, you appear to act like children with attention defacit disorders; sorry, it's what I observe, and it's not attractive - this thread is far beyond meaningless.

Just out of interest... what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate? This is not nice, and it would be unwise to encourage this to continue. We all get uptight, but ENCOURAGING people to attack one another? Really really silly.

Respect is oft hard-earned, especially when encountering strangers. This just re-inforces my opinion that these forums do not care about human feelings, they're just full of teenage ego warriors, seeing who can "outwit" ( :? ) the last person.

Come on guys, are you truly fulfilled to the depths of your hearts, by deriding and upsetting others?

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:23
by dox
GlossyWhite??

Re: The Ultimate Flame Topic

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:29
by itlnstln
iamwhoiam wrote: Come on guys, are you truly fulfilled to the depths of your hearts, by deriding and upsetting others?
Yes.

If you're going be a bitch and hide your head in your momma's vag, then GTFO.

Otherwise, nut up and join the fun.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:49
by ripster
TIL what contra bonos mores means.

It's kinda like Naked Rambling.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:52
by The Demongolator
Good trolling! :twisted: Needs more bawdry. :twisted:

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:56
by off
iamwhoiam wrote:what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate?
On that I say that it's also used as a sink-hole, to drain the drama from the threads- to keep those a bit more concise and on point. That ethic is not so shabby imho.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 01:58
by ripster
More nekked male hind quarters???
Spoiler:
Image

Whoah, LIFE IN PRISON!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... rison.html

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 02:10
by off
@iamwhoiam
See? ripster lives here. ^^

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 02:32
by ripster
Prudes!

Let it hang FREE!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ror-arrest
Gough's behaviour is obviously unusual. But abnormal is not the same thing as criminal. While he has been adjudged to have broken the law, it's hard to see what crime he has committed. Any society that thinks prison is the correct place for him has lost grip of a basic principle of liberty. "Man is born free," wrote Rousseau, "but everywhere he is in chains."
Typed while GOING COMMANDO! on my Filco Camo keyboard.
Just out of interest... what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate? This is not nice, and it would be unwise to encourage this to continue. We all get uptight, but ENCOURAGING people to attack one another? Really really silly.
Cave anas is the kind of moderator ethic that lets my biggus dickus swing! Somebody let me know if the German moderators go online.

ANTI NUDITY GERMANS! Ich bin die letze!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17309841
Spoiler:
Image

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 02:53
by webwit
In the interview she brings forward two major points in favor of continuation of the tradition.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 03:07
by ripster
I'd like to polish her Polish points.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 03:26
by iamwhoiam
off wrote:
iamwhoiam wrote:what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate?
On that I say that it's also used as a sink-hole, to drain the drama from the threads- to keep those a bit more concise and on point. That ethic is not so shabby imho.
Logic failure.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 11:21
by off
And you decided that based on?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg3CQ_Jx_a0[/youtube]

Guessing you missed the part where posts got moved here out of threads.
Still, whether you did or did not; logic fail on your part.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 15:24
by ripster
silat wrote:
ripster wrote:I'll start on this fucking moron then.
silat wrote:LOL now you are being funny. By funny I mean I am finally laughing at you.
You break your toys then run away from gh because gh will not bow down to you. Then you announce that you are going to OCN and on your way out the door leave a nasty note on the wiki.
And you run to OCN?
Sorry for the late reply..
My point?
Now you are going to play like you are a stupid idiot?
How typical.
Speak English motherfucker.

I know others here that leave nasty stuff in the GH wiki as they slam the door. OCN has young minds waiting, willing and WANTING to be educated by #1. As shown by my 233 rep status.

Silat - I notice you only post when I post. Homoerotic fixation?

Your point?

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 15:38
by off
ripster wrote:OCN has young minds waiting, willing and WANTING ... Homoerotic fixation?
:?

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 15:59
by ripster
Please stay on topic. Not OFF topic.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 16:30
by off
yah I'll be getting *off* your lawn now

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 16:56
by ripster
Damn kids. And next thing I know the neighbours are putting "Spot" on the grill and beheading chickens for New Years!

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 17:11
by off
Spot on pusscake. Nah you lost me on the spot.

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 17:32
by Icarium
I want awards for users that can be displayed alongside their posts. We can have a glossywhite award for people who make everyone talk about something else than keyboards...or for annoyingly pious people. :)
The glossywhite award will apply a filter to your avatar to make it look bright and shiny XD

Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 18:05
by off
Icarium wrote:We can have a glossywhite award for people who make everyone talk about something else than keyboards...
The glossywhite award will apply a filter to your avatar to make it look bright and shiny XD
+1 on the filter
or a textballoon overlayd on the avatar stating what you dropped in his topic x''D

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 06:25
by silat
[quote="ripster"][quote="silat"][quote="ripster"]I'll start on this fucking moron then.


ripster says: Silat - I notice you only post when I post. Homoerotic fixation?

ripster way to ruin your legacy. Nice job.
Thou doth protest to much moron.. Ill let the science do the talking:
For 25 years U of Ga researcher­s have recruited the most homophobic men on campus to watch gay porn while blood pressure cuffs record their arousal. Consistent­ly the phobes are aroused, while gay-friend­ly men aren't.
Anti-gay behavior is actually the surest confession of homosexual impulses.


You spend an awful lot of time bringing up homosexuals. Time to come to grip with your sexual ID issues bub.

I have acquired a rare video of ripsters response after his threats against gh failed and he was not named Dictator of geekhack.
[video]http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/ ... o-Copy.gif[/video]

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 10:34
by kbdfr
@silat

I can hardly be said to like ripster,
but what you call "science" is utter bullshit:
silat wrote:Ill let the science do the talking:
For 25 years U of Ga researcher­s have recruited the most homophobic men on campus to watch gay porn while blood pressure cuffs record their arousal. Consistent­ly the phobes are aroused, while gay-friend­ly men aren't.
Anti-gay behavior is actually the surest confession of homosexual impulses.

You spend an awful lot of time bringing up homosexuals. Time to come to grip with your sexual ID issues bub.
If you want to call that "science", then in such a context you have to first define "arousal". The experiment just says that the test persons are "aroused", but not that they actually "like" what they see - "arousal" can as well describe "being horrified".

Let’s replace "homophobic men" with "dealth penalty abolitionists", this is what you’ll get:
Researchers have recruited the most engaged death penalty abolitionists to watch capital execution videos while blood pressure cuffs record their arousal. Consistently the abolitionists are aroused, while death penalty supporters aren't.
Opposition to death penalty is actually the surest confession of death penalty supporting impulses.
Would you really say the last sentence is a scientific conclusion for such an experiment?
Well, in that case you did.

This point goes to ripster.

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 11:12
by silat
Since it is not the only study you can find then I would say YOU ARE WRONG.
Do some research.

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 11:26
by kbdfr
silat wrote:Since it is not the only study you can find then I would say YOU ARE WRONG.
Do some research.
Now THAT for sure is scientific argumentation. Image

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 15:45
by ripster
Nice thing about hateful trolls like Silat is you don't have to flame them. They are better at self immolation than a Tibetan monk.

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 15:57
by webwit
Ripster points to research in the last link here. :evilgeek:

Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 16:05
by ripster
My GH history lessons tend to be a bit like Japanese WW2 history lessons. A TAD biased.

Someone should see if all the penis threads got deleted at GH. I reported a year old post of mine to Bavman for the lulz and he erased it AND locked it!

Reminds me, can I post Lego Pedobear pics here?