wiki/Cherry_G80-0832
and
wiki/Gravograph_G80-0832H-04
which in fact is just a special edition of this one:
wiki/Cherry_G80-0778
I hope someone can fix that without waiting for me to imagine how

I wasn't aware of that. That would be a strong case. But I think we should only do that for those boards.hansichen wrote: ↑Especially with the very old boards every protocol and language had its own product number.
I like the format that if such a subsection would succeeds a certain length, it has a link to the "full article" instead, a separate page. So it could be both really.Blaise170 wrote: ↑It makes more sense in my mind to combine them all into a G80 page where each subtype gets its own subsection.
Yeah, I see that quite often on Wikipedia and it works well.webwit wrote: ↑I like the format that if such a subsection would succeeds a certain length, it has a link to the "full article" instead, a separate page. So it could be both really.
I don't think it's so tough in our case. We are not wikipedia where prominence is very important. But we're all about documenting minutia. So if we have an article about a keyboard with 10 subsections about different variants, and one person has one and goes wild in documenting/photographing it and makes a full article about it too, so what.It's a tough call. For example, I've left the page on the SIIG MiniTouch there, because a) it's a very prominent product, and b) it has a specific production history.
Generally, you'd only want a separate page if the product has some notable history or details that are worth separating out.
I would tend to agree, provided of course there are at least links in both directions.webwit wrote: ↑I don't think it's so tough in our case. We are not wikipedia where prominence is very important. But we're all about documenting minutia. So if we have an article about a keyboard with 10 subsections about different variants, and one person has one and goes wild in documenting/photographing it and makes a full article about it too, so what.It's a tough call. For example, I've left the page on the SIIG MiniTouch there, because a) it's a very prominent product, and b) it has a specific production history.
Generally, you'd only want a separate page if the product has some notable history or details that are worth separating out.
That's only one end of the scale. In kbdfr's case, it's two pages about the exact same keyboard! In the middle are all the awkward cases, where it's never clear — is there enough written about something to make it worth splitting it out? I've wrestled with this many times and never come to any firm conclusions.webwit wrote: ↑I don't think it's so tough in our case. We are not wikipedia where prominence is very important. But we're all about documenting minutia. So if we have an article about a keyboard with 10 subsections about different variants, and one person has one and goes wild in documenting/photographing it and makes a full article about it too, so what.
Maybe others have a different preference and like a separate page instead of ending up half way a long page.consolation wrote: ↑having a longer page, with all the various subtypes that can be found under the model number / name, is much more useful than individual pages which can be easily missed
The point is; it'll give the user a very salient feedback that there are other potential models, that may look almost identical.webwit wrote: ↑Maybe others have a different preference and like a separate page instead of ending up half way a long page.consolation wrote: ↑having a longer page, with all the various subtypes that can be found under the model number / name, is much more useful than individual pages which can be easily missed
This is of course a good argument, and it is an even better reason for naming the page G80-0832, because nowhere does "Gravograph" appear on the keyboard. Only the weird keycaps reveal it is the keyboard made for the Gravograph engraving machines, so someone confronted with just the keyboard will not know it is a Gravograph.Daniel Beardsmore wrote: ↑I always prefer to list items under the customer-facing identity.
Why create a whole new name format for just one page?kbdfr wrote: ↑How about naming the page "Cherry G80-0832 (Gravograph)"?
Under More → Move at the top right. This will automatically create the redirect (unless you decline it) but you need to manually categorise the redirect page afterwards.kbdfr wrote: ↑By the way, how do you modify page titles in the wiki?
It is a page whose sole content (aside from categories) of:kbdfr wrote: ↑And how do you make redirects?