Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 20:37
Mostly - Tab is missing. I do think layer ones are good. But I'll let others chirp in.
The tab of the base set is 1.5x, so we're good there.squarefrog wrote:Mostly - Tab is missing. I do think layer ones are good. But I'll let others chirp in.
[{ turns up on the 1.5 verticals in quite a few layouts that I've seen.jdeblese wrote:The tab of the base set is 1.5x, so we're good there.squarefrog wrote:Mostly - Tab is missing. I do think layer ones are good. But I'll let others chirp in.
/? is not common, but all the other common ones are in there already. It crops up on the verticals on a few layouts, but I guess we could exchange it for a layer key of some kind. Any suggestions?
No, I actually think there should be more kits/sets. In order to cover a simple winkeyless you have to buy the Pro kit which is going to be expensive, and has a lot more keys than needed (this is just an example). The ultimate solution would be to just have kits with only one key in each, and then people could get exactly what they'd like, but it of course depends on the price tiers.matt3o wrote:How so? You mean so many kits? Well it's dye sub so we have no restrictions on legends.Broadmonkey wrote:I really like the green "second" layer or shift characters, makes it worthwhile to have it dye sub instead of double shot.
What I don't understand however is why the sets must be so large. Do we know price tiers?
Personally I would gladly get rid of the Icon kit... but if there's really interest in it...
I'm sorry - my mistake! So that very first layout is the "base kit"?jdeblese wrote:The tab of the base set is 1.5x, so we're good there.
I might not be the best to answer - I'm a programmer so push/pop makes sense to me but to others maybe not. LAYER TOGGLE or LAYER SHIFT might be good.jdeblese wrote:squarefrog wrote: /? is not common, but all the other common ones are in there already. It crops up on the verticals on a few layouts, but I guess we could exchange it for a layer key of some kind. Any suggestions?
Code: Select all
---------
| |
| LAYER |
| + |
| |
|_______|
---------
| |
| LAYER |
| - |
| |
|_______|
[{ vertical makes a lot of sense to me, and as an Obj-C guy that's what I'd have anyway! Horizontal is less useful to me.jdeblese wrote:[{ turns up on the 1.5 verticals in quite a few layouts that I've seen.
It would be interesting to get an idea of price...Broadmonkey wrote:No, I actually think there should be more kits/sets. In order to cover a simple winkeyless you have to buy the Pro kit which is going to be expensive, and has a lot more keys than needed (this is just an example). The ultimate solution would be to just have kits with only one key in each, and then people could get exactly what they'd like, but it of course depends on the price tiers.
I've been calling it that for lack of a better name, but you're right, it's the one labeled PBT Granite. And I keep a little scrap of paper on my desk to measure withsquarefrog wrote: I'm sorry - my mistake! So that very first layout is the "base kit"?
I'm personally a little leery of any of these, as with the ergodox you also have to know which layer it's operating on.squarefrog wrote: I might not be the best to answer - I'm a programmer so push/pop makes sense to me but to others maybe not. LAYER TOGGLE or LAYER SHIFT might be good.
I have that one there as well, but I don't think we're ever gonna get everyone to agree where which symbols go, so I figured all sideways characters on the verticals was less objectionable than some sideways characters on the horizontals.squarefrog wrote:[{ vertical makes a lot of sense to me, and as an Obj-C guy that's what I'd have anyway! Horizontal is less useful to me.jdeblese wrote: [{ turns up on the 1.5 verticals in quite a few layouts that I've seen.
I think thats a very sensible compromise.jdeblese wrote: I'm personally a little leery of any of these, as with the ergodox you also have to know which layer it's operating on.
How about keeping it simple, and switching /? out for a LAYER key, which'll mean whatever the user wants it to mean? You could have a 1.0x LAYER key in the same vein, which I was planning on using FN for.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. It's nice to hear the thinking behind the layout.jdeblese wrote: I have that one there as well, but I don't think we're ever gonna get everyone to agree where which symbols go, so I figured all sideways characters on the verticals was less objectionable than some sideways characters on the horizontals.
I based it on a random sampling of configurator layouts and was aiming to largely cover the common ground, with the default querty layout fully covered. That was apart from layers, however, and you're right that they do crop up as L1 toggle on the middle column in quite a few layouts, so it's definitely worth switching out at least the /? key.squarefrog wrote:Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. It's nice to hear the thinking behind the layout.
I don't think that would be possible. Sorry.Broadmonkey wrote:No, I actually think there should be more kits/sets. In order to cover a simple winkeyless you have to buy the Pro kit which is going to be expensive, and has a lot more keys than needed (this is just an example). The ultimate solution would be to just have kits with only one key in each, and then people could get exactly what they'd like, but it of course depends on the price tiers.
Someone got the second errorNuum wrote:Shouldn't the RGB modifiers be all caps, too?
They don't have 6u in PBT (actually I have to ask, but I'm pretty sure they don't have it).Nuum wrote:A 6u spacebar like the one you have on your brownfox could be useful to some people.
depends on pricing. Long keys are expensive.mm87 wrote:Possible to have short right shift (1.75) in the RGB kit ?
you are right. my bad.Nuum wrote:German seems ok, but the 1! isn't really necessary, is it? I think, it's already in Ansi-US. Also, if we could let go of some third legends, the kits would be much smaller.
It's always hard to determine how far these compromises for a lower price should go. For me, if I spend the money for a keycap set and extra money for an international set in a group buy, I'd rather pay more and have an uncompromised set. These sets are luxury articles anyway, aren't they?Nuum wrote:Also, if we could let go of some third legends, the kits would be much smaller, e.g. 7/{ to 7/.
Looks great!matt3o wrote:okay... I must say it. it's very nice.
but still, I'm not completely sold.
7bit wrote:Looks great!matt3o wrote:okay... I must say it. it's very nice.
but still, I'm not completely sold.
You must make the A-Z green, too, because otherwise people think it has Caps Lock on by default.
Actually, I remember learning to type on a mechanical typewriter (already 20 years older than me) and I was confused why the keys said QWERTY but typed qwerty when you pressed them, unless you used Shift. The same was specifically *not* true for the symbols above the number keys etc.Broadmonkey wrote:Why would you think that?
I don't actually need legends on my caps at all, but when paying good money for premium items like this: every absence is glaring. I'd really like my single legend § key for the top left of my ISO boards.Halvar wrote:... and mine, I checked against a DE keyboard, but not against US ANSI.
It's always hard to determine how far these compromises for a lower price should go. For me, if I spend the money for a keycap set and extra money for an international set in a group buy, I'd rather pay more and have an uncompromised set. These sets are luxury articles anyway, aren't they?Nuum wrote:Also, if we could let go of some third legends, the kits would be much smaller, e.g. 7/{ to 7/.
"Look, I have this exclusive 100 € PBT spherical dyesub set on my 130 € Filco (or 250 € custom designed board)! And I spent an extra 50 € to have the legends in my language! Yes, I know the € sign and {[]}²³~| are missing, but after all it was 10€ cheaper that way and I know where everything belongs anyway!"
couldn't agree more...Halvar wrote:"Look, I have this exclusive 100 € PBT spherical dyesub set on my 130 € Filco (or 250 € custom designed board)! And I spent an extra 50 € to have the legends in my language! Yes, I know the € sign and {[]}²³~| are missing, but after all it was 10€ cheaper that way and I know where everything belongs anyway!"