Page 1 of 1

Wang Workstation Keyboard, xwhatsit

Posted: 09 Jan 2018, 07:16
by OldIsNew
I recently acquired this Wang keyboard as a Christmas gift. I don't know which system it was part of and can't find any identifiable markings on the case - just the brand logo. It's a vintage KeyTronic foam and foil. The back of the case is heavy plastic and the front cover is metal. The PCB is stamped Oct 16, 1985 and the case is stamped Oct 25, 1985.
Wang_orig_sm.jpg
Wang_orig_sm.jpg (503.7 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Wang_case_open_sm.jpg
Wang_case_open_sm.jpg (608.8 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Wang_case_open2_sm.jpg
Wang_case_open2_sm.jpg (438.98 KiB) Viewed 3736 times

It has a solenoid, which is always a plus in my book:

Wang_solenoid_smjpg.jpg
Wang_solenoid_smjpg.jpg (384.93 KiB) Viewed 3736 times

Front plate with keycaps removed:

Wang_front_plate_sm.jpg
Wang_front_plate_sm.jpg (396.87 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Back of front plate:
Wang_foil_sm.jpg
Wang_foil_sm.jpg (405.07 KiB) Viewed 3736 times

PCB front:
Wang_PCB_Front_sm.jpg
Wang_PCB_Front_sm.jpg (539.58 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Wang_PCB_date_sm.jpg
Wang_PCB_date_sm.jpg (195.42 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
PCB Back:
Wang_PCB_back_sm.jpg
Wang_PCB_back_sm.jpg (537.13 KiB) Viewed 3736 times


The original foam and foil was in bad shape, as usual, so had to be replaced:
Old foam and foil removed
Old foam and foil removed
Wang_foam_removed_sm.jpg (416.82 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
New foam
New foam
Wang_new_foam_sm.jpg (449.71 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
New foil
New foil
Wang_new_foil_sm.jpg (503.33 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Wired up the xwhatsit and a solenoid driver:
Wang_rewired_sm.jpg
Wang_rewired_sm.jpg (483.09 KiB) Viewed 3736 times



It's a nice board over all - I'm still a fan of the vintage KeyTronic F&F.
Wang_finished_sm.jpg
Wang_finished_sm.jpg (430.8 KiB) Viewed 3736 times
Short video of typing on board:

I'd like to find out about the board model number, etc. - as I mentioned no markings on the case itself except for the Wang logo. I've seen pictures of similar boards with various Wang terminals - does anyone know more about these boards?

Posted: 09 Jan 2018, 13:29
by Chyros
All I know is that I've got a Honeywell Hall effect keyboard that looks almost identical which was for a Wang 271.

Very nice mod as always! :)

Posted: 09 Jan 2018, 14:34
by just_add_coffee
Very nice! I had no idea solenoids were in other keyboards besides IBM. Or that foam and foil could sound like that. Thanks for sharing this.

Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 04:59
by XMIT
This has largely gone under the radar. Using an xwhatsit as a capsense controller for these old foam and foil boards is a tremendous discovery. If you're willing to put in the time to replace the foam and the foil these are fantastic boards, often with thick doubleshot spherical key caps on medium to heavy weight linear switches.

@OldIsNew I'm curious to know, what sensitivity setting are you using for this board? For IBM boards I usually have it set to about 120. Curious to see how the capsense mechanism on this board differs at all. Did you have any trouble selecting a setting - do you find some keys are more or less sensitive?

Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 09:50
by seebart
XMIT wrote: This has largely gone under the radar. Using an xwhatsit as a capsense controller for these old foam and foil boards is a tremendous discovery. If you're willing to put in the time to replace the foam and the foil these are fantastic boards, often with thick doubleshot spherical key caps on medium to heavy weight linear switches.
Interesting to see how KeyTronic F&F is not getting "ripped" for a change, I could not agree more although I have never tried younger F&F than those in my 1980 terminal keyboard. Good work OldIsNew!

Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 22:20
by OldIsNew
Thanks everyone for the nice comments.
XMIT wrote: . If you're willing to put in the time to replace the foam and the foil these are fantastic boards, often with thick doubleshot spherical key caps on medium to heavy weight linear switches.
seebart wrote: Interesting to see how KeyTronic F&F is not getting "ripped" for a change, I could not agree more although I have never tried younger F&F than those in my 1980 terminal keyboard...
Yes! I really like the "vintage" tall stem KeyTronic F&F:
20171028_223447.jpg
20171028_223447.jpg (45.49 KiB) Viewed 3544 times
I do have one board with the short stem version that I really don't like - I think those may be the switches that seem to have given KT F&F a bad rep:
20171028_230115.jpg
20171028_230115.jpg (58.16 KiB) Viewed 3544 times
XMIT wrote: @OldIsNew I'm curious to know, what sensitivity setting are you using for this board? For IBM boards I usually have it set to about 120. Curious to see how the capsense mechanism on this board differs at all. Did you have any trouble selecting a setting - do you find some keys are more or less sensitive?
I haven't had any problems with finding a voltage threshold setting for the boards I've done, but there has been a fair amount of variance in the settings that work best for each board. I have just taken the approach of dialing down until I get good response - and then see how low I can go before I start getting wonky key presses. These are the voltage threshold settings I'm using on the boards I've done:

Westinghouse W1642: 160

TRS 80 Model II: 180

KayPro II: 185

L3 Communications: 135

Wang Workstation : 190

I think the various on board controller components affect the xwhatsit sensitivity settings on these boards and have had to do a fair amount of desoldering resistors and caps, etc , on some of the boards to isolate the row/column pads adequately. While I have noticed that there is some variation in sensitivity among the keys on any given board, I haven't noticed any particular pattern to this.

Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 22:31
by Sangdrax
I saw this on ebay a little while back. Nice to see you got it.

Also, on the sensitivity, I've found that additional stuff on the capsense like a solenoid board changes the settings bit, usually needs a higher voltage for stability. Same for you? The Wang is certainly up there.

Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 21:54
by OldIsNew
Sangdrax wrote: I... on the sensitivity, I've found that additional stuff on the capsense like a solenoid board changes the settings bit, usually needs a higher voltage for stability. Same for you? The Wang is certainly up there.

I didn't really think about that but I think so - I did end up increasing the threshold on the board after hooking up the solenoid, but at the time I figured I just hadn't quite set it right before. May have been the effect of connecting the solenoid/driver board though.

I took the solenoid driver I used for the Wang out of the Westinghouse board (WH didn't originally have a solenoid - I added for the heck of it) so I think I'll go back and see if I can dial down the voltage on that board. If so, that would be a good indication that it had been affecting the required voltage setting.