(Somewhat) more compact cases for IBM 3278 beam spring?
- Hypersphere
- Location: USA
- Main keyboard: Silenced & Lubed HHKB (Black)
- Main mouse: Logitech G403
- Favorite switch: Topre 45/55g Silenced; Various Alps; IBM Model F
- DT Pro Member: 0038
My IBM 3278 beam spring is on the shelf waiting for me to find the time to start the restoration and conversion to USB. In the meantime, although some may consider this sacrilege, I have been wondering if it might be possible to find somewhat smaller cases that would accommodate the innards of the 3278 beam spring. In particular, IBM produced some Model F versions of the 3278 beam spring board. In addition, Memorex Telex and Key Tronics made their versions of the 3278.
Does anyone here know if any of the cases from alternative keyboards to the 3278 beam spring (or others I have overlooked) would accommodate the internal keyboard assembly of the IBM 3278 beam spring keyboard?
Does anyone here know if any of the cases from alternative keyboards to the 3278 beam spring (or others I have overlooked) would accommodate the internal keyboard assembly of the IBM 3278 beam spring keyboard?
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
Beam springs are huge. There's no getting around it…
IBM developed the Model F as a low profile replacement, and they certainly advertised it as such, compared to the "typewriter style keyboard" beam spring models. So while the layouts may be similar, these cases won't be deep enough to house beam spring mechanisms. Or at least I'd be surprised if they could.
IBM developed the Model F as a low profile replacement, and they certainly advertised it as such, compared to the "typewriter style keyboard" beam spring models. So while the layouts may be similar, these cases won't be deep enough to house beam spring mechanisms. Or at least I'd be surprised if they could.
-
- Location: UK
- Main keyboard: Filco ZERO green alps, Model F 122 Terminal
- Main mouse: Ducky Secret / Roller Mouse Pro 1
- Favorite switch: MX Mount Topre / Model F Buckling
- DT Pro Member: 0167
You could always make your own case for it! You have to love IBM there low cost alternative to a beam spring was the model F that was still over-engineered ( that's not a bad thing) and then they try to cut the price again and come up with the model M that is still built like a tank.
I wonder what happened to the models G H I J K L or does the M and F stand for something i wonder , who knows IBM do love there strange names and acronyms then again when you pretty much invented everything you can call it what you like .
Back on topic
I would just get some sort of wrist rest to support your arms and embrace the size.
Or grow bigger hands.
I wonder what happened to the models G H I J K L or does the M and F stand for something i wonder , who knows IBM do love there strange names and acronyms then again when you pretty much invented everything you can call it what you like .
Back on topic
I would just get some sort of wrist rest to support your arms and embrace the size.
Or grow bigger hands.
- Halvar
- Location: Baden, DE
- Main keyboard: IBM Model M SSK / Filco MT 2
- Favorite switch: Beam & buckling spring, Monterey, MX Brown
- DT Pro Member: 0051
I don't think there will be compatible cases from IBM, for the reasons that Muirium gave, but there is definitely some unneeded height in the outer 3278 case, maybe about 5 or 6 mm. The keyboard itself is in an inner case that cannot be made smaller I think, but you could design an outer case that is less high and maybe less steep, too.Hypersphere wrote: ↑Does anyone here know if any of the cases from alternative keyboards to the 3278 beam spring (or others I have overlooked) would accommodate the internal keyboard assembly of the IBM 3278 beam spring keyboard?
The hard but ideal solution would be to make a case that can replace the inner case in a way that renders the outer case obsolete... That way you could probably save 8-10 mm of height.
The problem with all this: the keyboard alone, from the lower plate to the top of the key cap is still 50 mm! So you're really not gaining too much. It would probably be better to use a lower table.
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
IBM did indeed think of that:
http://deskthority.net/workshop-f7/beam ... ml#p163927
@Andrew: the letters F and M do in fact stand for something. F is for "fly plate", which is the flipper on the underside of Model F's buckling springs; the crucial component the capacitative sensing detects and makes the keyboard work. That capsense system is actually very similar to the earlier beam spring's (which is how Xwhatsit tackled them both with his controller), although the polarity is reversed! Meanwhile, the M is for "membrane", the Model M's dirty secret. Out went the capsense and in came the same direct electric contact technology still found in cheap keyboards today. That also brought limited rollover and a susceptibility to getting wrecked by spills. Still, they kept most everything else right at least.
http://deskthority.net/workshop-f7/beam ... ml#p163927
@Andrew: the letters F and M do in fact stand for something. F is for "fly plate", which is the flipper on the underside of Model F's buckling springs; the crucial component the capacitative sensing detects and makes the keyboard work. That capsense system is actually very similar to the earlier beam spring's (which is how Xwhatsit tackled them both with his controller), although the polarity is reversed! Meanwhile, the M is for "membrane", the Model M's dirty secret. Out went the capsense and in came the same direct electric contact technology still found in cheap keyboards today. That also brought limited rollover and a susceptibility to getting wrecked by spills. Still, they kept most everything else right at least.
- Daniel Beardsmore
- Location: Hertfordshire, England
- Main keyboard: Filco Majestouch 1 (home)/Poker II backlit (work)
- Main mouse: MS IMO 1.1
- Favorite switch: Probably not whatever I wrote here
- DT Pro Member: -
- Contact:
- Hypersphere
- Location: USA
- Main keyboard: Silenced & Lubed HHKB (Black)
- Main mouse: Logitech G403
- Favorite switch: Topre 45/55g Silenced; Various Alps; IBM Model F
- DT Pro Member: 0038
Given all the numbers on the beam spring patent figure, they might have included the dimensions! They could be depicting something as tall as a Saturn V rocket or as diminutive as a nanobot. However, some of the posters in this thread gave some quantitative information that will be helpful. Eventually, I will get around to refurbishing, at which time I can get the measurements I need. Looks like I will be either using the stock case or possibly building one myself.Muirium wrote: ↑Beam springs are huge. There's no getting around it…
IBM developed the Model F as a low profile replacement, and they certainly advertised it as such, compared to the "typewriter style keyboard" beam spring models. So while the layouts may be similar, these cases won't be deep enough to house beam spring mechanisms. Or at least I'd be surprised if they could.
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
- Halvar
- Location: Baden, DE
- Main keyboard: IBM Model M SSK / Filco MT 2
- Favorite switch: Beam & buckling spring, Monterey, MX Brown
- DT Pro Member: 0051
Model M for membrane sounds so convincing I would hardly believe anything else even with a source...
But F for fly plate doesn't make a lot of sense to me since beam spring switches had something that was called "Fly Plate", while in Model F those were replaced by "Pivot Plates". Maybe the latter wwere still also called fly plates, but it was at least nothing new with Model F..
But F for fly plate doesn't make a lot of sense to me since beam spring switches had something that was called "Fly Plate", while in Model F those were replaced by "Pivot Plates". Maybe the latter wwere still also called fly plates, but it was at least nothing new with Model F..
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
Searched my PMs (thanks for adding that function Webwit, it's proving very useful!) and, not so surprising, I only remembered half right. Dorkvader wrote this to me in July 2013, and I've continued making the mistake all too often since!
I've swapped springs between the two since then (feasible, and perhaps necessary once all the F springs go bad someday) but not the plates / hammers themselves. The plastic frames they sit inside, beneath the barrels, are indeed identical as far as I can tell.dorkvader wrote:By the way, "flip plates" are part of the switch mechanism for mode F keyboards (or "flip plate keyboards" as is more common in ibm parlance. beam springs are called "fly plates"). The model M equivalent is usually called a hammer. I think you can put a flip plate into a model M switch, but it'll feel different, I imagine.
- Hypersphere
- Location: USA
- Main keyboard: Silenced & Lubed HHKB (Black)
- Main mouse: Logitech G403
- Favorite switch: Topre 45/55g Silenced; Various Alps; IBM Model F
- DT Pro Member: 0038
F = flip or fly; M = mallet. (Sorry, no documentation!).
-
- Location: Belgium, land of Liberty Wafles and Freedom Fries
- Main keyboard: G80-3K with Clears
- Favorite switch: Capacitative BS
- DT Pro Member: 0049
Another theory is that "model F" was based on some continuation of model naming scheme for workstations.
See for example http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledge ... rouble.htm to have just an overview in the numbering insanity.
I guess only someone at IBM would have known, though he must have been driven mad.
See for example http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledge ... rouble.htm to have just an overview in the numbering insanity.
I guess only someone at IBM would have known, though he must have been driven mad.
- dorkvader
- Main keyboard: Unicomp
- Main mouse: CST 1550
- Favorite switch: Buckling Spring over Capacitave. (Model F)
- DT Pro Member: -
I head that the F stood for 'flip-plate' and the M for 'membrane,' but I think of it as a mnemonic rather than anything official.Muirium wrote: ↑I think Dorkvader was the first to explain this to me, back when I was very new to all this, via PM. Anyone with a proper printed IBM source is welcome to pipe up.
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
It's a good mnemonic. Almost too good!
I honestly don't understand IBM's naming conventions at all, and any time I have to remember what something is called I go searching for its nickname instead! Thank goodness for Kishsavers and Great Whites.
I honestly don't understand IBM's naming conventions at all, and any time I have to remember what something is called I go searching for its nickname instead! Thank goodness for Kishsavers and Great Whites.
- dorkvader
- Main keyboard: Unicomp
- Main mouse: CST 1550
- Favorite switch: Buckling Spring over Capacitave. (Model F)
- DT Pro Member: -
I like mnemonics. That's why I'm pushing for "pingmaster" instead of "IBM chinese / japanese tee-mount alps keyboard" or "IBM 6112884" Much easier to remember.Muirium wrote: ↑It's a good mnemonic. Almost too good!
I honestly don't understand IBM's naming conventions at all, and any time I have to remember what something is called I go searching for its nickname instead! Thank goodness for Kishsavers and Great Whites.
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
Ah, especially as the IBM number changes arbitrarily with different language models.
http://deskthority.net/photos-f62/ibm-5 ... t4564.html
Great name. What's different about them compared to the (seemingly) similar switches in the Apple M0110?
http://deskthority.net/photos-f62/ibm-5 ... t4564.html
Great name. What's different about them compared to the (seemingly) similar switches in the Apple M0110?