Alphameric foam and foil
Posted: 29 Apr 2014, 01:06
Nick from Devlin was so kind as to send me a little goodie back of Alphameric switches. What's interesting is that they're not the switches I thought they'd be. The ones Devlin still make as spares (after acquiring the keyboard division of Devlin) are the foam and foil version.
Goodie bag:
Switches:
Even before I got home, I'd already broken one of the springs :)))
It makes me laugh just looking at it. I break things.
No time left to post anything to the wiki — I also took the time to do the SMK clones that padath sent me. Despite my rubbish camera skills I even got some really nice pics of the hard-to-see "logo" on the bottom. And spent some time trying to get one back together before realising I had the terminals in back to front … I hate SMK switches and their ilk, they're such a headache to reassemble, though I've found a way to get the vintage ones together most of the time, at least.
And thanks to the mess that is modern IT, my camera's hit image 9999 and rolled over into a new directory, with filenames that are duplicates of the ones I've already got. (I always rename the existing ones back a letter, e.g. IMGP → IMGO, IMGO → IMGN etc so that they're always in name order. Why I need a frigging "P" in the name instead of a fifth digit, I will never know. In fact, why not just have a whole eight digits. It's not like I haven't taken 30,000+ images on this one camera already ...)
Goodie bag:
Switches:
Even before I got home, I'd already broken one of the springs :)))
It makes me laugh just looking at it. I break things.
No time left to post anything to the wiki — I also took the time to do the SMK clones that padath sent me. Despite my rubbish camera skills I even got some really nice pics of the hard-to-see "logo" on the bottom. And spent some time trying to get one back together before realising I had the terminals in back to front … I hate SMK switches and their ilk, they're such a headache to reassemble, though I've found a way to get the vintage ones together most of the time, at least.
And thanks to the mess that is modern IT, my camera's hit image 9999 and rolled over into a new directory, with filenames that are duplicates of the ones I've already got. (I always rename the existing ones back a letter, e.g. IMGP → IMGO, IMGO → IMGN etc so that they're always in name order. Why I need a frigging "P" in the name instead of a fifth digit, I will never know. In fact, why not just have a whole eight digits. It's not like I haven't taken 30,000+ images on this one camera already ...)